Many women and girls, dressed, seemingly, can still look ridiculous. How not to fall into this category of bad taste, read on ...

Posted on at


1. At the same time the open top and bottom of dress

In no case can not wear a blouse with a deep neckline and a minishirt. This combination looks vulgar and can even spoil the most beautiful figure. Therefore, stick to the board style icon Victoria Beckham: "Do not flaunt it!"

2. Peeping thongs

Thong sticking out of jeans, a long time called "fishtail". Previously, this could  be see all the time. But today, some girls like to "show off" their underwear. The author notes about fasion Englishwoman Camilla Morton said: "There is nothing less attractive than a faded elastic strings!"

By the way, tights, which peek out from under the waistband of his trousers, also banned. For better insulation, use a special tights with low-slung.

3. Sandals and socks / tights / stockings

Sandals is created to wear them without socks, because so called.

In addition, the seam of tights toe does not look very attractive. That is why this rule applies to shoes with open finger. Some may argue, citing the example of the many models that have appeared on the podium, even wool socks and sandals! But note, they are on the podium, even with open chest appear, but you do not go down the street .

4. The cage and stripes (in other colors) together

Box and strip - it is always bright and fashionable, but wearing these colors should be separately. If you put in the top of the strip, and a skirt or trousers in a cage, then together they create an incredible combination, at the same time even the most disfiguring a beautiful figure.

5. Shorts + Shoes

Shorts this season remain relevant, but they should only wear shoes, sandals or ballet flats. But in  any case not with sneakers!

The exception - athletic shorts.

Sneakers - not the kind of shoes that can beautify women'a legs, so follow a simple rule: we want to open the leg - choose a more elegant shoes. Also remember that shorts should not be too tight-fitting.

 



About the author

160